Nothing symbolizes “made in California” more than the iconic salmon
November 24, 2013
By Stephanie Taylor, Sacramento Bea, November 24, 2013
Nothing symbolizes “made in California” more than the iconic salmon.
Chinook salmon, born in inland watersheds, migrate to the sea to mature and return to where they were born, to reproduce. But their access to natural spawning grounds in the foothills and mountains is prevented by dams on most of California’s waterways. The salmon’s fight for survival on the American River exemplifies the consequences of man engineering nature.
While Nimbus and Folsom dams provide hydroelectric power and flood control for us, they block miles and miles of habitat for salmon to lay and fertilize eggs. Man turned his attention to rescuing salmon as their populations declined. Completed in 1958, the Nimbus Fish Hatchery creates generations of salmon and steelhead. Here, migration ends and begins.
When the fall run of chinook salmon returns, the hatchery erects a barricade across the river. Hundreds of people come to celebrate the heroism of these fish, to marvel at the wonder of nature. This year, thousands of salmon have fought their way back to fulfill their biological destiny. Against cascading water, salmon enthusiastically leap 20 levels of the fish ladder, in bubbly anticipation of spawning. These chinook are native but not wild.
Shasta Coho count is second-highest in six years
November 22, 2013
By David Smith, Siskiyou Daily News, Nov.22, 2013
Adult salmon continue to return across the Klamath River’s Siskiyou tributaries as cold weather descends on the county.
Shasta Chinook numbers had surpassed 8,000 at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife video weir by Nov. 13, bringing the total for the season so far to 8,097. Coho on the Shasta saw a large gain over the 10-day period between reports, bringing this year’s total to 80 adults – the second-highest Coho return on the Shasta in the past six years, according to CDFW weir data.
Nearly 400 more Chinook returned to Bogus Creek by Nov. 6, bringing the year’s total to 3,121. Coho also saw a large increase, growing from one to 28 since the previous report. The data for Bogus shows that this year’s total, thus far, is the second-lowest Chinook return in the past nine years.
The data for the Scott River still shows a slow return year, with 2,785 Chinook counted at the river mile 18 video weir by Nov. 12, along with seven Coho.
Preliminary numbers up to Nov. 11 for the Trinity River show 1,942 Chinook trapped at the Trinity hatchery, along with 1,029 Coho.
The trap weir located at Willow Creek has counted approximately 498 adult Chinook as of Nov. 11, and 272 Coho.
Why do Pacific Salmon Die After Spawning
November 21, 2013
By Alessandra Bergamin (Steve Lindley), San Francisco Bay Nature, November 21, 2013
The upriver salmon run is one of nature’s great migrations. Each year mature salmon make the long journey back to their natal river to reproduce, just once. For the five species of Pacific salmon (Chinook, chum, coho, pink, and sockeye), this arduous journey is a race against the clock that ends in a fleeting romance and ultimately death.
The answer to why they die, it turns out, hinges on a problem every animal on Earth has had to solve.
“Every kind of organism has evolved to solve the problem of balancing how much energy to put into surviving to first reproduction and how much energy to put into surviving to reproduce repeatedly,” said Steve Lindley, the director of NOAA’s Fisheries Ecology Division.
“Salmon are one of the extreme cases where they put everything into reproducing just once, and then getting old and dying almost immediately thereafter (a common strategy among insects but much less so for vertebrates).”
The reason for this, Lindley suggested, has to do with the difficult upriver migration salmon make back to their own spawning location. Flipping their bodies in the air and hurling themselves against the downward flowing water is no easy feat and one that is energetically exhausting. Because of this, salmon must fully develop in the ocean and build up fat reserves. Once they enter the river there is little food to eat and they stop investing in the maintenance of their bodies.
“The proximate reasons have to do with DNA switches,” Lindley said. “Essentially many of the activities that operate in immature salmon to allow them to maintain their health, grow and mature are turned off after maturation, and without maintenance they pretty rapidly ‘fall apart’.”
An alternative for these salmon species would be to spend more time in the ocean, accumulating food and energy so they are then able to migrate back after spawning. But this increases their risk of dying before getting the chance to spawn and for Pacific salmon, this is is a risk too great.
Klamath salmon: Siskiyou numbers update
November 15, 2013
By David Smith, Siskiyou Daily, November 15, 2013
The latest salmon run counts from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife video weirs are available, and preliminary numbers from the year's creel count suggest a much better year for fishermen than 2012.
According to weir data, the latest count of Chinook salmon on the Shasta River on Nov. 3 was 7,942, with the late-running Coho at 20 so far this year. The data show that the bulk of Coho returns in previous years occurred in late November.
For Bogus Creek, the latest numbers date back to Oct. 25, with 2,628 Chinook and one Coho passing the weir. Like the Shasta and Scott rivers, previous annual data show Coho returns ramping up later than Chinook.
In the Scott River, Nov. 7 data puts Chinook at 2,587 for the year, with four Coho. With the Scott's video weir at river mile 18, the end-of-season run numbers are augmented by physical counts of the fish that spawn closer to the mouth.
The angler harvest report for Chinook salmon, according to this year's preliminary data, showing 13,400 adult Chinook harvested over the course of 22,698 reported fishing trips that encompassed 103,752 fishing hours. The total reported harvest last year was 5,792.
For steelhead, the numbers show 229 harvested and 1,844 released thus far.
Board of Supervisors drops objection to Nature Conservancy's water use
November 14, 2013
By Kevin Dickinson, Siskiyou Daily News, November 14, 2013
The Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors voted to withdraw its protests regarding eight petitions filed by The Nature Conservancy to dedicate its water rights to in-stream flow. Streams affected include Little Springs Creek, Big Springs Creek and the Shasta River. Acting as the Siskiyou County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the board's withdrawal came with the condition that the draft water rights order and compliance plan remain in its current form.
The board voted four to one in approval. Supervisor Ed Valenzuela, District 2, provided the only no vote. He said his vote was not in opposition of TNC's plans, saying the board's added stipulation wasn't necessary. "TNC is doing a positive thing," Valenzuela said. "I'm comfortable with allowing this to move forward. I still think the positives are a benefit for everyone concerned."
The adjudicated water rights for Shasta Big Spring Ranch are historically used for agriculture; however, a 1707 permit would allow TNC to leave the water in streams to benefit habitat, fish and wildlife. "We are trying to be granted the right to use that portion of irrigation water for the fish," Amy Hoss, TNC's Shasta River Project manager, told the supervisors at Tuesday's meeting.
The supervisors expressed some concerns over the reallocation – chief among them an easement purchased by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that grants it the ability to determine whether the ranch's water rights would be used for fish or agriculture as of Sept. 15, 2015. "We are working closely with (DFW) to talk about the shared usages of ranching and salmon restoration and demonstrating that we can do both there," Hoss said. "I would hesitate to say we would be all right with that not being a ranch anymore."
Tim Beck, Lower Shasta and Little Shasta watermaster, clarified that the water rights in question only run through the summer. "I wish they would have trusted (TNC) with the water rights," Supervisor Brandon Criss, District 1, said.
"The controversial part of this is the DFW having control of the water, and we know they don't pay their property taxes if they took this property in the future," Supervisor Michael Kobseff, District 3, said. "I don't know what harm may come to water users if (DFW) had full control."
During public comment, John Menke of Quartz Valley called TNC a broker for other agencies to buy land. While he did applaud TNC for its motives, he added, "You can't trust this Fish and Wildlife. They have none of our interests at heart."
Richard Marshall, president of the Siskiyou County Water Users Association, requested the supervisors let the matter go to superior court to determine the beneficial use.
After the meeting, Hoss told the Daily News, "I'm really encouraged by the process. I feel it's been a useful exercise to hear everyone's concerns.