News & Stories

  • Fishing may be banned on Russian River (w/video)

    January 30, 2014

    By Mary Callahan, Press Democrat

    California fish and wildlife officials may move next week to close the Russian River to fishing because of the impact of drought conditions on water levels and threatened migratory species.

    The proposal, which appears to be unprecedented, is slated to be taken up Wednesday by the California Fish and Game Commission.

    If approved it would shut down the river's main stem to anglers through April 30 from Jenner to just north of Ukiah.
    Officials with the state Department of Fish and Wildlife are recommending the move as part of a package of emergency regulations to help lessen the threat to fish already struggling to survive and spawn in extremely low-flow conditions around Northern and Central California.

    The appointed five-member commission, which meets in Sacramento, can approve, ignore or alter the proposal.

    “We can't make it rain,” but reducing the pressure of continued fishing may encourage survival against the odds, department spokeswoman Jordan Traverso said.

    She said the measure was aimed especially at protecting adult fish attempting to move upriver to spawn.

    The proposal has drawn mixed reaction from anglers, though they generally support it. Some say the critically dry conditions and confined fish have given them more than enough reasons to pull their lines.

    Others say the complete ban unnecessarily restricts those going after hatchery-raised steelhead, which are raised to provide a sport fishery.

    “On one hand, it would do the fish a lot of good to have no pressure on them, especially in the low water situation,” said Bruce MacDonell, president of the roughly 80-member Russian River Wild Steelhead Society, whose mission includes enhancement of the river ecosystem. “On the other hand, our system has two hatcheries built on it, as you know, as mitigation, and they make fish for sport fishing. So where do you draw the line?”

    Read the article at the source »

  • Calif. bans fishing in drought-stricken streams

    January 29, 2014

    The Sacramento Bee by The Associated Press

    SAN FRANCISCO -- California on Wednesday banned fishing in some of the state's drought-stricken streams in an effort to protect imperiled salmon and steelhead, which rely on coastal waterways to grow and spawn.

    The closures are aimed at protecting as many fish as possible as stream flows dwindle because of the severe drought, said Charlton Bonham, director of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

    "We fully understand the impact these closures will have on California anglers and the businesses related to fishing in California, and we really feel for them," Bonham said in a statement. "However the science is clear. Two-thirds of the wettest part of winter is now behind us, and conditions are looking increasingly grim."

    Among the closures are the San Lorenzo River and its tributaries in Santa Cruz County; the Big Sur River and area streams; the Eel River in Humboldt County; and others.

    Some anglers took the news in stride, saying the long-term health of the environment will benefit fishermen in the future.

    "There will certainly be an impact this year on anglers and the businesses that supply them. But anglers would be ill-served in the long run by further stressing the present populations in coastal streams," Marc Gorelnik, of the Coastside Fishing Club, said. "First and foremost, we must be responsible stewards of our state's natural resources."

    Most of California is in extreme drought, which led Gov. Jerry Brown to declare a drought emergency.
     

    Read the article at the source »

  • California drought threatens coho salmon with extinction

    January 28, 2014

    SF Gate by Peter Firmrite

    The lack of rain this winter could eventually be disastrous for thirsty California, but the drought may have already ravaged some of the most storied salmon runs on the West Coast.

    The coho salmon of Central California, which swim up the rivers and creeks during the first winter rains, are stranded in the ocean waiting for the surge of water that signals the beginning of their annual migration, but it may never come.

    All the creeks between the Golden Gate and Monterey Bay are blocked by sand bars because of the lack of rain, making it impossible for the masses of salmon to reach their native streams and create the next generation of coho. The endangered coho could go extinct over much of their range if they do not spawn this year, according to biologists.

    "It may already be too late," said Stafford Lehr, chief of fisheries for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. "The Central Coast coho could be gone south of the Golden Gate."

    The situation is bad even in the one place fish can get upstream, in West Marin County. Very few coho have been seen in Lagunitas Creek, long considered a bellwether of salmon health in the region, according to Eric Ettlinger, the aquatic ecologist for the Marin Municipal Water District.

    Attempt to lure the coho

    The dire situation prompted the district to release 29 million gallons of valuable drinking water from Kent Lake early this month in an effort to lure the coho into the watershed, which winds 33 miles through the redwood- and oak-studded San Geronimo Valley on the northwest side of Mount Tamalpais.

    Watershed biologists in Marin have counted only 57 coho redds, the word scientists use for the clusters of pink eggs that salmon lay in the gravel. That's "exceptionally low for mid-January," Ettlinger wrote in his weekly spawning update. More than 100 redds were counted last January in Lagunitas Creek, where many thousands of fish once spawned until seven dams were built in the watershed to supply Marin with drinking water.

    Read the article at the source »

  • Swimming for their lives

    January 25, 2014

    Recordnet.com by Alex Breitler, Staff Writer

    More than 20,000 salmon splashed up San Joaquin Valley streams to spawn last year, a relatively robust return that you'd think would bode well for future populations.

    But now biologists are worried that the offspring of those fish will not survive, because there's simply not enough water to flush the babies back downstream toward the ocean.

    And if they don't make it out alive, that means fewer adult salmon returning to our rivers three years down the road.

    It's a problem faced by wildlife managers up and down parched California. Salmon have survived droughts like this for millennia, but only in the past century did dams block access to hundreds of miles of cold-water streams that once provided a kind of refuge for fish during dry times.

    Officials managing the Mokelumne River are considering trapping the young fish, putting them in tanker trucks and transporting them downstream past the Delta, perhaps releasing them somewhere around Sherman Island.

    That strategy is not unheard of, but it does show how concerned experts are about the salmon's survival.

    Read the article at the source »

  • California's Pot Farms Could Leave Salmon Runs Truly

    January 13, 2014

    By Alastair Bland, The Salt

    For many users and advocates of marijuana, the boom in the West Coast growing industry may be all good and groovy. But in California, critics say the recent explosion of the marijuana industry along the state's North Coast — a region called the "emerald triangle" — could put a permanent buzz kill on struggling salmon populations.

    The problem? According to critics, marijuana plantations guzzle enormous amounts of water while also spilling pesticides, fertilizers and stream-clogging sediments into waterways, including the Eel and the Klamath rivers, that have historically produced large numbers of Chinook salmon and related species.

    "The whole North Coast is being affected by these pot growers," says Dave Bitts, a Humboldt County commercial fisherman and the president of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations.

    "I have nothing against people growing dope," he says, "but if you do, we want you to grow your crop in a way that doesn't screw up fish habitat. There is no salmon-bearing watershed at this point that we can afford to sacrifice."

    Growers of marijuana often withdraw water directly from small streams and use up to 6 gallons per day per plant during the summer growing season, says Scott Bauer, a fisheries biologist with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

    "When you have 20,000 or 30,000 plants in a watershed, that is a lot of water," Bauer says.

    But marijuana growers are undeservedly taking the blame for a problem that is caused by all residents of the North Coast, argues Kristin Nevedal, a founding chairperson with the Emerald Growers Association.

    Read the article at the source »

^